Her kan du se de mest populære sider blandt fagfolk på Kræftens Bekæmpelses hjemmeside.
Knowledge on how to measure and interpret patient experience data
Patients have exclusive knowledge about important aspects of care, and measuring patient experiences provide us with unique information that can be used for quality improvement. Furthermore, positive experiences reported by patients have shown to be associated with patient safety, health outcomes and clinical effectiveness.
Inviting patients to give feedback on health care is an essential part of patient-centered care, and results of patient experience surveys are increasingly being used and acknowledged as an important parameter of quality.
Patient experience surveys are increasingly used as a method for evaluating important aspects of quality of care and the results are used politically to support general decision-making. However, there have been limited attempts to summarize the newest and most essential knowledge on how to measure and interpret patient experience data.
This paper aims to summarize knowledge on the association between delivered care and patient reported experience and the factors influencing this association, and to outline a conceptual model illustrating the association. The method employed is integrative literature review. The article is written by the Danish Cancer Society and Danish Patients and Danish Knowledge Center for User Involvement in Health Care.
Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience
Patient reported experience is an often used but poorly defined concept. Patient experience is used to describe both patient reports on objective facts and evaluations based on the patients’ subjective views. Thus, patient experience measures include both objective information on specific events and subjective evaluative measures.
Model associations
Thematic analysis was conducted and the results were used to synthesize a model by integrating identified factors including: expectations, patient characteristics, survey timing, loyalty to health professionals, backing up own choices and questionnaire and item design where identified as factors influencing the association.
The model sums up knowledge on the association between received care and patient reported experience. The model underlines that the association between received care and patient reported experience is complex. Patient reported experience data should be interpreted with caution, as reported positive experiences might neither reflect high quality care nor satisfied patients.
Figure 2: The model shows the proposed association between received care and patient reported experience and the factors modifying this association.
Conclusion and recommenation
Measures of patient experiences are important information and should be a priority for health care managers. However, there are significant challenges with regard to analyzing and interpreting data, thus practitioners must be cautious when using the information in quality assessment and in decision-making processes.
It is important to be aware of the differences between received care, patient experience and reported patient experience as these are very different concepts and a number of factors influence the associations between them. This awareness is especially important when using data for decision-making purposes.
Measures of patient experienced quality should not be used to conclude that the quality of care is good. Instead, patient satisfaction surveys should be used as a management tool for identifying areas of improvement. Whereas the knowledge that patients in general rated information about the risk of late effects much worse than information about surgical procedure and information on possible side effects provides a clearer idea that information on possible side effects should be improved. In this way, using patient experience scores relatively can be used to identify potential problems and priorities for quality improvement initiatives
There is conceptual and methodological uncertainty regarding what constitutes patient experience, and how it should be measured. There is a need for developing an explicit and accepted model and robust methods for the measurement and interpretation of patient reported experiences. The model depicted in figure 2 is a starting point.
The complexity of the concept should not stop us from using patient experience data. We just need to use them in a better way. Whatever theoretical challenges there are, we need to overcome them because the patient perspective on quality of care is crucial if we want to achieve a patientcentered health care system.
Sidst ændret: 01.03.2016
Kræftens Bekæmpelse
Strandboulevarden 49
2100 København Ø
Tlf.: 35 25 75 00
E-mail: info@cancer.dk
CVR: 55629013
EAN numre
Kontakt
Privatlivspolitik
Henvendelser om indsigt i
og sletning af persondata:
Indsigt i persondata
Sletning af persondata
Klager over brug af persondata:
E-mail: dpo@cancer.dk
Professionel og gratis rådgivning
Tlf.: 80 30 10 30
Hverdage kl. 9 - 21
Lør. - søn. kl. 12 - 17